Awakening brands to the power of social media
Jon Gunn, social brand editor, Gutenberg Networks
First written for and posted in ‘The Marketer‘ April 13th, 2012
Increasingly over recent years, brands large and small have awoken to the reality that they need to engage with the emerging environment of social media. Some have accepted this because they see others doing the same and don’t want to lose their competitive advantage. Others recognise the expansion of permission based marketing and the shift in consumer behaviour from one of passive involvement to active engagement.
Some brands that stepped into the social media space early on have gained the biggest advantage. Being an early adopter can always pose risks but also has the potential to help steal a march on the other latecomers to the game.
There is good news for those who are only just engaging. Like many situations in life, sometimes it pays to wait a little and watch before joining in. As the array of social media platforms has grown exponentially and many of these have evolved and developed the landscape is beginning to settle.
The beta models have been run and now we are witnessing a shift from early testing to one of focused commitment. User and consumer patterns are emerging and now we have a body of evidence to validate which tactics produce the most effective and efficient response. Social Media is reaching puberty.
Some brands who have jumped in early, for all their good intentions they have got it badly wrong. Exploring the potential of new media can be a risky business and with such a seismic shift in both the application of the media and a shift in consumer mentality there are lots of variables to deal with.
Above all though I’m glad to say finally, on the whole, they are beginning to understand that they have to take social marketing seriously and make it function properly. Many now realise it is not just about how many “likes” or “fans” that they have or as the support act for other activities. Social media is begging to drive large volumes of engagement and subsequent sales.
BVE Post event / Loudness Metering (LUFS)
Written by: Wade Ridgway, technical director, GNTV.
We wandered around London BVE at Earl’s Court last week looking, and listening, for all things going on around loudness. BVE once again out did itself, with lots of super-smart folks to answer questions around the “whats” and “whys” of the new audio standards. We are all figuring out how the industry is adapting itself to new ways of working in this area and it’s important we are getting it right, across our workflows.
So, is LUFS the new PPM? We’re in the market for adaptations and playing out dozens of commercials every day to global destinations has revealed anomalies and difficulties in the new loudness metering standards. It seems the traditional PPM method has fragmented with subtle variations across stations using the new LUFS system. Some stations still require PPM while others demand that their interpretation of the EBU R128 standard be met. Some stations are more aggressive than others in upholding the new standard.
So, although we’re all specced to measure LUFS and be sound (no pun intended) technically in the audio mix, it seems that different audio requirements across stations mean the old days of one master for multiple destinations has turned into one master per station in some cases.
As we look to drive value for clients we will be working hard to align broadcaster deliverables with our production schedules / rate cards / turn around times so as not to send audio mastering costs up, which isn’t always straight forward. Let’s hope the industry, or at least regions adopt common standards soon.
Note: We’re currently using Nugen LMB file based LUF metering and correction tool for our QC process. It gives us a clear graphic representation of the metering carried out, which we copy into our QC records, as well as keeping a log of all files processed. It even has an auto fix option too for the brave, but we like to keep the job of mastering in the audio suite.
What does the Williams Lea Takeover of Tag mean for the age-old agency model debate?
By Simon Steel- Managing Director – Gutenberg Networks 
There’s an inevitability about Williams Lea buying Tag this summer and it should not have been a surprise to anyone watching the evolution of the production industry. The more eagle-eyed amongst us will notice a few changes occurring, which the Williams Lea takeover of Tag brought to the fore:
1) There are new entrants to the marketing services industry in the form of outsourcers from other sectors and locales (both on- and off-shore) who believe they too could provide outsourced marketing services.
2) On-going consolidation occurring: Tag and Williams Lea and the Hogarth – WPP alliance etc.
3) The big networks (Publicis, IPG and Omnicom etc) are trying to build and promote their own marketing services companies – Redworks’ former global CEO and Head of North America joining IPG.
What the Williams Lea takeover of Tag really illustrated is that scale is an issue (a global presence is truly required to provide the best solutions for clients) and links to a marketing agency is crucial to success. Hogarth had marketing clients but not the agency relationships, whereas Williams Lea bought Tag in part because it has both the marketing clients and the agency relationships. The question now is how they actually leverage them.
Williams Lea ought to be in a very strong position, with the investment backing of Deutsche Post. A non-agency aligned network, as some brands will be thinking that going down the independent production provider route is better. Then again, brand managers and procurement alike also understand that the large holding companies offer the global reach and stability they require.
Classically, the Williams Lea/Tag move may herald an age in which we see the erosion of any remaining middle ground, resulting in fewer medium-sized companies, leaving lots of niche specialists and a few very large, enterprise players. This ups the ante in our industry – it presents a different alternative for brands that may well start demanding more. It will be interesting to see whether the move by Williams Lea will challenge the large holding companies or focus their efforts further.
Once again, this raises the age old debate of the traditional agency model and what the longer term implications are – many production businesses will be asking themselves if there is a conflict if you’re part of a holding company or whether in reality enterprise scale production is the infrastructural element agencies and clients will need in the future?
My view is that whilst there is room for both, the holding company solution will be more persuasive because of the positive links to agency networks, an in-depth understanding of the nature of the business and the direct line into clients’ marketing teams. The challenge remains for clients though, how they will engage and work with a new strategic partner?
Gutenberg Networks‘ Simon Steel
First published on the 12-Jan-2011 in www.mmc.co.uk, by Simon Steel, Managing Director, Gutenberg Networks.

I hate most door drops. But there are exceptions. Some 99% of the time they simply are not relevant. Typically I bin the majority of them – it must be pretty special to avoid this fate. Even personalised items must work hard to get me to read them, never mind respond. Adding insult to injury in our online world, offline direct mail has a tough job to penetrate our screen obsessed, click-through sensibilities. So how do some of the last festive season’s received door drops measure up?
IKEA – Do boxing day before Christmas

A pleasant surprise: even the format of this piece is on message and plus there’s a charity kick-back to ease spending guilt. It is surprisingly well produced on reasonable quality paper stock, simply machine-glued and the square format plays cleverly on the ‘boxing day’ headline. A nicely thought through approach, eye-catching headline and clearly explained proposition: top marks.
The rest of this article….
http://www.mmc.co.uk/News/Doormat-Digest-Gutenberg-Networks-Simon-Steel/
Savvy marketers are recognising print as a powerful medium that can bring rich rewards. Marketers from ‘Google’ and ‘Which?’ joined leading industry experts including Gutenberg’s MD Simon Steel to thrash out how print works best. Read about what they discussed and watch the video as the round table participants explain their views….
Exerts from an article written by ‘Marketing’ and ‘PrintPower’ - first published in ‘Marketing’ – 12/7/2011
http://www.marketingmagazine.co.uk/go/printcreativity
Simon Steel, managing director, Gutenberg Networks:
“As a global production company, we are seeing a shift in the way that people mix different media. There has been a dangerous commoditisation of print, rather than looking at where the value lies.”
Has print become less creative?
Simon Steel: “There are multi-faceted versions of print. At one end, it’s cheap as chips and still used for carpet bombing. At the other end, you can do highly-personalised pieces and still turn around 1.3m copies in 24 hours. Part of the difficulty is reasserting where print fits in the value chain, engaging early enough with the client. Brands can do more, better. It may feel that print has become less important, but there’s just more that you can do.”
“If you think about print as a mass medium, the dynamics just do not work. You can’t have a shallow relationship with a very large group of people. Which? is a classic success. It has 1.3m subscribers paying £10 a month for print and digital. What they have is an intimate knowledge of all of their subscribers.”
To read the rest of the article go to:
http://www.marketingmagazine.co.uk/go/printcreativity
Gutenberg-Networks are one of the only Production Specialists who possess a dedicated team of online experts managing global digital campaigns.
Whether it is online advertising, building microsites, or e-CRM activity, our production frameworks ensure consistency, quality and value for money.
Services & Solutions: Direct-to-studio
Gutenberg-networks have a package of services that allows clients to take appropriate work directly into production without the need for creative agency involvement.
This provides real, significant time and cost efficiencies at both a local and international level.










